Soigner, dominer et s’émanciper en mission au Gabon. Oeuvre médicale et logiques d’autorités féminines (années 1890-années 1930)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si l’intervention médicale européenne au Gabon n’est pas méconnue du grand public, c’est qu’inévitablement s’impose à la pensée la figure du célèbre docteur Schweitzer dans son hôpital de Lambaréné. Cet article se propose de décentrer le regard pour s’arrêter sur l’oeuvre sanitaire féminine au sein des missions catholiques et protestantes jusqu’à l’entre-deux-guerres. À travers l’analyse croisée d’archives coloniales et missionnaires, cette étude interroge l’enchâssement de l’activité médicale dans des logiques d’autorités religieuses et genrées. Il s’agit de découvrir les interstices de liberté que l’oeuvre sanitaire a ménagés aux infirmières chrétiennes, mais aussi d’explorer de l’intérieur les luttes d’influence qui n’ont pas manqué de s’exercer sur les populations accueillies au dispensaire. En cela, la voix des malades doit être exhumée afin de rendre compte au plus juste de la diversité des réponses africaines à ces pratiques médicales venues d’Occident.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".