MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413989854 · doi:10.1080/14601176.2025.2539007

The ‘Great Plane’: the designed landscape at Loudoun Castle, East Ayrshire, Scotland, 1690 to the early 1900s

2025· article· en· W4413989854 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Margaret Stewart

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryGeographyAncient historyDemographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The designed landscape at Loudoun Castle, Ayrshire in southwest Scotland, is of the highest importance in the history of Scottish landscaping, It is a formal landscape of extending avenues aligned on distant focal points – a style now recognised as the Scottish Historical Landscape. This essay is a detailed account of Loudoun’s design and development based on primary sources which include archival documents and maps, and contemporary aerial and Lidar survey. The methods used include archival research, map digitisations, land survey, aerial and land photography, as well as the analyses of cultural, historical and symbolic content and a pertinent historiographical issue. The attribution of the design to the Earl of Mar was first made in the nineteenth century and this essay confirms this from an archival source. Mar’s collaborators are identified as Hugh Campbell, 3rd Earl of Loudoun (c.1677–1731), the executant architect on site was Alexander McGill (died 1734) and the architect, James Gibbs (1682–1754) contributed now lost garden buildings. Finally, the essay presents a stylistic analysis of the design and links Loudoun with other plans by the Earl of Mar, placing it within the Scottish and the wider European contexts of the period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in the History of Gardens & Designed LandscapesSame topicCultural Heritage Management and PreservationFrench-language works237,207