MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413991220 · doi:10.3390/math13172855

Impact of Driver Anticipation on Traffic at a Ramp in Foggy Conditions

2025· article· en· W4413991220 on OpenAlexaff
Zawar H. Khan, Khurram Shehzad Khattak, T. Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnticipation (artificial intelligence)Transport engineeringComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceAeronauticsPsychologyEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new macroscopic traffic model is proposed based on visibility distance and the time to collision (TTC) in foggy conditions. The TTC is obtained from real traffic data. It is shown that the proposed model is hyperbolic and has a well-posed solution. Further, it is string stable. The proposed and Payne–Witham (PW) models are implemented in MATLAB R2019b using the first-order upwind numerical scheme and evaluated over a 3000 m circular road with a ramp at 1500 m. The results show that the proposed model can effectively characterize traffic in poor visibility, while the PW model provides unrealistic results. Thus, the proposed model can be used to accurately predict traffic behavior and alleviate congestion in foggy conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematicsSame topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207