Noise-Robust-Based Clock Parameter Estimation and Low-Overhead Time Synchronization in Time-Sensitive Industrial Internet of Things
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Time synchronization is critical for task-oriented and time-sensitive Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) systems. Nevertheless, achieving high-precision synchronization with low communication overhead remains a key challenge due to the constrained resources of IIoT devices. In this paper, we propose a single-timestamp time synchronization scheme that significantly reduces communication overhead by utilizing the mechanism of AP to periodically collect sensor device data. The reduced communication overhead alleviates network congestion, which is essential for achieving low end-to-end latency in synchronized IIoT networks. Furthermore, to mitigate the impact of random delay noise on clock parameter estimation, we propose a noise-robust-based Maximum Likelihood Estimation (NR-MLE) algorithm that jointly optimizes synchronization accuracy and resilience to random delays. Specifically, we decompose the collected timestamp matrix into two low-rank matrices and use gradient descent to minimize reconstruction error and regularization, approximating the true signal and removing noise. The denoised timestamp matrix is then used to jointly estimate clock skew and offset via MLE, with the corresponding Cramér-Rao Lower Bounds (CRLBs) being derived. The simulation results demonstrate that the NR-MLE algorithm achieves a higher clock parameter estimation accuracy than conventional MLE and exhibits strong robustness against increasing noise levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".