MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413994278 · doi:10.3390/s25175492

Design of a Low-Cost Flat E-Band Down-Converter with Variable Conversion Gain

2025· article· en· W4413994278 on OpenAlexafffund
Mehrdad Harifi-Mood, Mansoor Dashti Ardakani, D. Hammou, E. Moldovan, Bryan Hosein, Serioja Ovidiu Tatu

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFocus Microwaves (Canada)Université du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsVariable (mathematics)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design and implementation of a wideband diode-based down-converter operating from 60 to 90 GHz with a variable flat conversion gain. The proposed down-converter is implemented utilizing the Miniature Hybrid-Microwave Integrated Circuit (MHMIC) technology. It is composed of a wideband double-balanced mixer, a Local Oscillator (LO) chain, and a differential TransImpedance Amplifier (TIA) with a variable gain. The designed mixer uses a novel topology exhibiting minimum reflection and high isolation between the RF and LO ports across a wide operating frequency of 30 GHz. In this topology, two balanced detectors generate the differential IF signal with minimum reflection. The characteristic impedance (Z0) of the mixer is set to be 70.7Ω, to minimize trace widths to reduce the mutual coupling and increasing the bandwidth. The OPA 657 is the core of the designed differential TIA with a variable gain. In addition, the LO chain of the down-converter utilized a combination of an active (×2) and a passive (×3) multiplier to generate enough RF power in the desired frequency range. Also, a WR-12 waveguide to Substrate Integrated Waveguide (SIW) transition is designed for the RF and LO ports that operates through the E-band. The proposed down-converter demonstrates excellent performance, with a high isolation between RF and LO ports exceeding 22 dB and a maximum conversion gain of -5 dB, and a response with a variation of ±5 dB across the band. The proposed mixer exhibits a return loss of better than 10 dB at both RF and LO ports, and it consumes a power of 560 mW.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensors→Same topicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides→French-language works237,207→