Kedudukan Produk Klaster 3 Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap sebagai Produk Pendaftaran Tanah (Studi Kasus PTSL 2023 Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Tojo Una-Una Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRAK Terdapat 536 bidang tanah produk klaster 3 pendaftaran tanah sistematis lengkap (PTSL) pada Kantor Pertanahan (Kantah) Tojo Una-Una yang harus dilakukan pengulangan proses pendaftaran tanah dari awal agar dapat ditingkatkan menjadi sertipikat hak atas tanah. Harapan produk klaster 3 PTSL dengan mudah dapat ditingkatkan menjadi sertipikat hak atas tanah dikemudian hari sulit terjadi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kedudukan produk klaster 3 PTSL sebagai produk pedaftaran tanah. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang memanfaatkan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Bahan hukum primer yang dimaksud yaitu peraturan perundang-undangan, petunjuk teknis mengenai PTSL sedangkan bahan hukum sekunder yaitu wawancara dan sejumlah literatur yang membahas mengenai PTSL dan pendaftaran tanah. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah perundang-undangan, dan konseptual. Bahan yang terkumpul dianalisis secara deskriptif kualitatif. Produk klaster 3 PTSL bukan merupkan produk pendaftaran tanah yang bertujuan utama agar dapat diterbitkan sertipikat hak atas tanah. Produk klaster 3 PTSL sebagai produk pendaftaran tanah hadir untuk menghimpun dan menyajikan informasi yang lengkap mengenai data fisik dan data yuridis pada satu desa lokasi PTSL yang bidang tanahnya secara subjek maupun objek tidak dapat dilakukan pembukuan hak. Produk klaster 3 PTSL sebagai hasil kegiatan proses pendaftaran tanah yang belum selesai dan belum melahirkan hak atas tanah menyebabkan produk K3 akan selalu dibayangi dengan potensi melahirkan fakta- fakta hukum baru, oleh hal tersebut pengulangan kegiatan pada produk klaster 3 PTSL pada saat ingin dibukukan haknya haruslah dianggap sebuah kewajaran. ABSTRACT There are 536 plots of complete systematic land registration(PTSL) cluster 3 product land in land office(kantah) Tojo Una Una, the land registration process must be repeated from the beginning so that it can be upgraded to a land title certificate. The hope that PTSL cluster 3 products can easily be upgraded to become land title certificates in the future will be difficult to achieve. The aim of this research is to determine the position of PTSL cluster 3 products as land registration products. This research is normative legal research which utilizes primary and secondary legal materials. The primary legal materials in question are statutory regulations, technical instructions regarding PTSL, while the secondary legal materials are interviews and a number of literature discussing PTSL and land registration. The approach used is statutory and conceptual. The collected material was analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The PTSL cluster 3 product is not a land registration product whose main aim is to issue land title certificates. The PTSL cluster 3 product as a land registration product is here to collect and present complete information regarding physical data and juridical data in a village where PTSL is located where land plots as subjects and objects cannot be recorded as rights. Cluster 3 products PTSL are the result of land registration process activities that have not been completed and have not given birth to land rights, causing K3 products to always be overshadowed by the potential to give birth to new legal facts, therefore repetition of activities in PTSL cluster 3 products when the rights are to be recorded must be considered a reasonableness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".