Epstein-Barr Virus–Associated Gastric Cancer: A Histopathologic Study With Comprehensive Molecular Profiling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A subset of gastric cancers (GCs) is linked to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. This study aims to characterize the histopathological and molecular features of EBV-associated GCs (EBVaGCs), focusing on predictive biomarkers and genomic and transcriptomic analysis. A total of 35 primary EBVaGCs were considered. The presence of EBV was confirmed with in situ hybridization. Immunohistochemical analyses for HER2, PD-L1, claudin 18.2, and mismatch repair proteins were performed. Genomic and transcriptomic profiles were assessed using AmoyDx Master Panel, which can identify single-nucleotide variants, InDels, and copy number variations on 571 hot genes, as well as microsatellite status, tumor molecular burden, and homologous recombination deficiency at the DNA level; however, at the RNA level, it identifies rearrangements/fusions in 45 genes and also quantifies the expression of 2396 cancer-related transcripts. The following histotypes were identified: carcinoma with lymphoid stroma (CLS; 69%), tubular (20%), and mixed (11%). Most cases were associated with atrophic gastritis (71%), and only 11% with dysplasia. The vast majority (94%) of EBVaGCs expressed EBV-encoded RNA in all tumor cells. Mismatch repair deficiency and HER2 overexpression were each observed in 6% of cases, whereas all tumors had a PD-L1-combined positive score ≥10. Sixty-six percent of cases showed moderate/strong claudin 18.2 expression in ≥75% of cancer cells. The most frequently altered genes were PIK3CA (41%) and ARID1A (17%). Transcriptomic analysis revealed substantial differential gene expression between EBVaGCs and EBV-negative controls, with upregulation of genes involved in antigen presentation, natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction in EBVaGCs. Within EBVaGC, CLS showed higher expression of immune-related transcripts and higher PD-L1 expression than other histotypes. This study establishes EBVaGC as a distinct molecular class, with a distinctive profile of genomic alterations and expression of predictive biomarkers, and also with a unique immune microenvironment with enhanced cytotoxic activity. The findings highlight EBV's role in early tumor development and EBVaG-CLS as a distinct subgroup within EBVaGC, characterized by unique morphologic features and a pronounced immune activation profile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".