MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413998267 · doi:10.18280/jesa.580716

Design an Intelligent Multifunction Generator Protection System Based on the P-Q Capability Curve

2025· article· en· W4413998267 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Saad Hadi A. Alahmed, Ahmed Nasser B. Alsammak, Hasan A. Mohammed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid and Power Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Mosul
KeywordsGenerator (circuit theory)Computer sciencePhysicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synchronous generator is a fundamental component in the power grid and therefore, requires intelligent protection systems to ensure safe and reliable operation.This study aims to design a multifunctional intelligent protection system based on the generator capability curve and the generator's inlet air temperature.The methodology involves using MATLAB/Simulink to simulate a model consisting of a synchronous generator connected to a power transformer and an infinite busbar.The main technique used is the Fuzzy Inference System (FIS), which evaluates performance deviations and their severity, enabling protection decisions that adapt to the cooling air temperature.The system also integrates multifunctional protection that includes various protection mechanisms for the generator.The key findings reveal a significant impact of the generator's inlet air temperature on generator performance.It was shown that an increase in the cooling air temperature may cause the generator to operate beyond the limits of the capability curve, even without exceeding conventional protection thresholds.The proposed system activates protection only when truly necessary and automatically adjusts protection settings based on operating conditions, especially temperature fluctuations.This design offers a practical and scalable solution for protection systems, enhancing reliability and minimizing operational and maintenance expenses, and reducing unexpected failures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicSmart Grid and Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207