MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413999618 · doi:10.18280/jesa.580717

Vibration-Based Fault Detection in Power Transformers: A Neural Network Approach to Inter-Turn Short Circuits

2025· article· en· W4413999618 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ahmed Hadjadj, Ahmed Belkhiri, Tahar Seghier, A. Belhamiti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkTransformerVibrationFault detection and isolationElectrical engineeringShort circuitComputer scienceElectronic engineeringElectronic circuitFault (geology)EngineeringAcousticsArtificial intelligenceVoltagePhysicsActuatorGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transformers are essential elements of modern power networks because they assure efficient electrical distribution and transportation.They are susceptible to internal faults though, including inter-winding short circuits, which are hard to identify in real time with traditional methods such as heat monitoring and gas dissolved analysis.These flaws have the potential to seriously impair transformer performance and result in pricey system failures.For the purpose of to identify winding short-circuit defects, this research proposes a vibration analysis-based method that makes use of artificial neural networks (ANN) and the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT).This method analyses vibration frequency variations as failure indicators and uses ANN to accurately classify a variety of situations.According to results from experiments, the suggested method differentiates between normal and defective states under various load situations, enabling early and accurate fault diagnosis.The ability of the system to keep monitoring transformers without needing shutdowns boosts efficacy in functioning, lowers repair costs, and increases the power grid's overall accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207