MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414000933 · doi:10.63564/jha.v14n2p16

Natural disasters in the United States: Hurricane risk, hospital closures, and healthcare finance

2025· article· en· W4414000933 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
George Raul Audi, Hanadi Hamadi, Margaret Capen, Rima Tawk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hospital Administration · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
KeywordsNatural disasterHurricane katrinaHealth careNatural (archaeology)Medical emergencyFinanceMedicineBusinessGeographyPolitical scienceMeteorologyArchaeologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Global climate change has increased the likelihood of natural disasters, including hurricanes, floods, wildfires, tornadoes, and earthquakes; this increased risk presents acute socioecological disturbances that generate cascading impacts across healthcare systems, social structures, and economic frameworks. Forty-three percent of Atlantic hurricanes that make U.S. landfall hit the southeastern United States, and their increasing intensity threatens the healthcare infrastructure. Hospital cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs) vary between rural and urban facilities, but hurricane risk impacts on hospital financial performance remain poorly understood. Objective: To examine relationships among hurricane risk, geographic location, and hospital CCRs among southeastern hospitals. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was used to merge 2021 CMS Cost Report data with 2023 FEMA National Risk Index data for 1,030 hospitals across eight southeastern states. All hospitals within this region were included except for federally funded hospitals due to their unique funding model. Each hospital self-reports its categorization of urban or rural on the CMS Cost Report. Multivariate regression was used to examine associations among log-transformed CCR and hurricane risk percentile, rural/urban location, and hospital quick ratio. Results: Among 1,030 hospitals analyzed, 52% were rural and 48% urban. The regression model explained 24.7% of CCR variation (adjusted R2 = 0.2465, F = 85.18, p < .0001). All predictors were statistically significant (p < .0001). Counter to expectations, each 1-point increase in hurricane risk percentile was associated with a 0.1% decrease in CCR, indicating improved cost efficiency in higher-risk areas. LOGCCR = - .75714 - .00840 (NAPCT) - .26551 (RURAL) + .01491 (QUICK) - .00011 (QUICK2). Rural hospitals as indicated by the CMS Cost Report demonstrated 26.5% lower CCR compared to urban hospitals. Hospital quick ratio showed a curvilinear relationship with CCR; at the mean quick ratio (3.819), each 1-unit increase was associated with a 1.4% increase in CCR. No significant multicollinearity was detected among predictor variables. Conclusions: Hurricane risk is paradoxically associated with lower hospital CCR, suggesting complex financial adaptations in high-risk areas. Rural hospitals maintain more favorable cost structures than urban facilities, and policymakers should consider these geographic variations in disaster preparedness strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hospital AdministrationSame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207