MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clubroot Disease: 145 Years Post-Discovery, Challenges, and Opportunities

2025· review· en· W4414003178 on OpenAlexaff
Dinesh Adhikary, Sabina Adhikari, V. Chapara, William Truman, Jutta Ludwig‐Müller

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Review of Phytopathology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClubrootBiologyDiseaseBotanyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clubroot, a destructive disease of Brassicaceae, is caused by the soilborne, biotrophic protist Plasmodiophora brassicae . The pathogen was first identified by Mikhail Woronin in 1875 and named turnip disease in England. This pathogen has a unique, multiphase life cycle that takes place largely within a living host; however, it can also persist as resting spores in the soil for several years. P. brassicae pathotypes have strong adaptability, enabling them to overcome host resistance. Sustainable control requires an integrated approach, combining resistant cultivars, crop rotations, and soil amendment to optimize soil pH. The complexity and severity of clubroot have led to research efforts over the past 145 years, yielding significant advances in integrated disease management. Here, we discuss recent discoveries in the pathogenesis of P. brassicae , focusing on pathogen distribution, genetic diversity, trends in host–pathogen interactions, and advancements in genomics and effector biology as well as approaches to disease management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnual Review of PhytopathologySame topicPlant Disease Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207