MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414003277 · doi:10.14740/jh2064

Beyond the Blood Cell: The Emerging Role of Cell-Free DNA in Transfusion Medicine

2025· article· en· W4414003277 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jackson Montgomery Wahman, Elizabeth D. Duncan, Petra Ročić, Dominica Moussoki, Hosam Gharib Abdelhady

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransfusion medicineMedicineCellBlood transfusionDNABlood cellCell-free fetal DNAImmunologyIntensive care medicineBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) consists of fragmented nuclear and mitochondrial DNA circulating in the bloodstream, primarily originating from hematopoietic cells. While cfDNA analysis has transformed diagnostic medicine, its presence in transfused blood products introduces emerging clinical concerns. Donor-derived cfDNA may persist in transfusion recipients and contribute to transfusion-associated microchimerism, defined as the long-term presence of donor genetic material in recipient tissues or circulation. These fragments have potential to integrate into the host genome, modify DNA methylation and histone structure, and activate innate immune pathways such as Toll-like receptors. In addition to nuclear and mitochondrial sources, cfDNA in transfused blood may include environmental or dietary DNA acquired by donors, further influencing immune regulation. Current leukoreduction methods do not eliminate cfDNA or prevent microchimerism. This review synthesizes current evidence regarding the persistence, genomic integration, and immunologic impact of cfDNA in transfusion recipients. The findings highlight an urgent need for further investigation and refinement of blood processing practices to ensure transfusion safety and protect recipient health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HematologySame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207