MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414005840 · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ae03da

Seasonal evolution patterns of Arctic sea ice and their connection to tropical Pacific sea surface temperature anomalies

2025· article· en· W4414005840 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lejiang Yu, Shiyuan Zhong, Junqiao Feng, Cuijuan Sui

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Research Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJoint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Karst Science Research Center of Guizhou ProvinceEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
KeywordsClimatologySea iceArcticArctic ice packSea surface temperatureOceanographyThe arcticEnvironmental scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study applies the self-organizing map method to identify the primary modes of seasonal evolution in Arctic sea ice concentration anomalies from 1979 to 2023. The resulting patterns fall into two broad categories: negative sea ice anomalies, occurring more frequently after 2005, and positive anomalies, more common prior to 2005. Differences among the modes within each category are primarily driven by sea ice variability in the Bering Sea, Sea of Okhotsk, Labrador Sea, and Greenland Sea during boreal winter and spring. Warmer temperatures, increased longwave radiation, and southerly winds favor reduced sea ice, while cooler conditions and northerly winds support increased ice cover. These atmospheric anomalies are often linked to tropical Pacific sea surface temperature variability, which influences Arctic conditions via poleward-propagating Rossby wave trains triggered by changes in tropical convection. Our findings enhance the basis for seasonal, interannual, and decadal predictions of Arctic sea ice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Research LettersSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207