MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414008109 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2025.3600455

Offline Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Home Energy Management Systems With Heterogeneous EV Charging Load Models

2025· article· en· W4414008109 on OpenAlexaff
Luolin Xiong, Yang Tang, Kankar Bhattacharya, Mo–Yuen Chow, Feng Qian

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceReinforcementLoad managementEnergy managementEnergy (signal processing)Electrical engineeringElectronic engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With increasing penetration of Electric Vehicles (EVs) into the transportation system and smart electricity grid, there is a growing need for integrating them into Home Energy Management Systems (HEMS). This integration within HEMS introduces dynamic user behaviors and time-varying charging demand, thus posing challenges for the HEMS. To mitigate these challenges, this paper proposes a charging model for heterogeneous EVs that covers the range of Plug-in Hybrid EVs (PHEVs), Range-Extender EVs (REEVs) and Battery EVs (BEVs) with/without heat pumps. The proposed heterogeneous EV charging model considers weather conditions, estimated mileage and driver’s experience to describe the dynamic charging demand and the anxiety level influencing their behavior. To optimize the HEMS operation, minimizing the energy cost and ensuring comfort, this paper introduces an offline Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) algorithm which learns directly from pre-collected datasets, avoiding the cost and safety issues associated with continuous real-world interactions. The algorithm incorporates the Huber loss and a Q-quantile estimator to mitigate performance degradation from dataset anomalies such as data noise, sensor failure and human error, resulting in more robust HEMS optimization strategies. Experimental results demonstrate the method’s effectiveness in reducing total costs and analyze the performance of household devices with two different electricity rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207