MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414008401 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2025.3606647

Knowledge Sharing-Enabled Semantic Rate Maximization for Multi-Cell Task-Oriented Hybrid Semantic-Bit Communication Networks

2025· article· en· W4414008401 on OpenAlexafffund
Hong Chen, Fang Fang, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceTask (project management)MaximizationBit error rateComputer networkComputer architectureDistributed computingChannel (broadcasting)EngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In task-oriented semantic communications, the transmitters are designed to deliver task-related semantic information rather than every signal bit to receivers, which alleviates the spectrum pressure by reducing network traffic loads. Effective semantic communications depend on the perfect alignment of shared knowledge between transmitters and receivers, however, the knowledge alignment cannot always be guaranteed in practice. In multi-cell networks, due to heterogeneous transceivers with distinct knowledge bases and limited computation capabilities, and random channel conditions in between, it is challenging for mobile devices (MDs) to access the best small base station (SBS) to perform effective semantic communications and complete requested tasks. To address the knowledge mismatch issue, we propose a novel task-oriented semantic transmission mechanism, leveraging knowledge sharing and bit communications to guarantee the effective target task execution. To maximize the derived semantic-based performance metric, i.e., generalized effective semantic transmission rate of all MDs under the designed mechanism, a mixed integer nonlinear programming problem is formulated to jointly optimize knowledge sharing decisions, semantic extraction ratios, and SBS associations while satisfying the semantic accuracy and delay requirements of target tasks. By decomposing the formulated problem into multiple subproblems equivalently, an optimum algorithm is proposed and another efficient algorithm is further developed using hierarchical class partitioning and monotonic optimization. A variety of simulation results demonstrate the validity and excellent performance of proposed solutions over a wide range of system parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207