MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414008544 · doi:10.1016/j.ijppaw.2025.101134

Nemabiome metabarcoding of wild conservation bison herds and co-grazing cattle reveals different species compositions and low-level benzimidazole resistance

2025· article· en· W4414008544 on OpenAlexaff
Kaylee R Kipp, Elizabeth Redman, Joe L. Luksovsky, Dani Claussen, Lee Jones, Danielle Buttke, Christine M. Budke, Walter E. Cook, John S. Gilleard, Guilherme G. Verocai

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Parasitology Parasites and Wildlife · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsCalgary General Hospital
FundersNational Park ServiceU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceTexas A and M University
KeywordsBiologyHerdGrazingBenzimidazoleResistance (ecology)ZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

. The herds with the highest parasite species diversity were in Oklahoma, Iowa, and North Dakota. The herd in Colorado showed the least diverse parasite communities. Over the course of the two-year study, moderate to high GIN species diversity was observed across several of the conservation bison herds. Additionally, different parasite species proportions were determined between co-grazing bison and cattle herds. Lastly, low frequencies of the 200Y (TTC > TAC) polymorphisms, associated with benzimidazole resistance, were detected. Our study reveals differences in species diversity and richness among conservation bison herds across the United States and provides the first evidence of benzimidazole resistance markers in wild bison in North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Parasitology Parasites and WildlifeSame topicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesFrench-language works237,207