MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414013114 · doi:10.7764/steiniana.10.1.2025.3

Die hl. Edith Stein und die Schmerzensmutter: Leiden und Maria, die Mutter Jesu, in Edith Steins „Juxta crucem tecum stare“ (1938)

2025· article· es· W4414013114 on OpenAlexaff
Carolyn Beard

Bibliographic record

VenueSteiniana revista de estudios interdisciplinarios · 2025
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicPhenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtDie (integrated circuit)PhilosophyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In midst of the mounting persecution of Jews in Germany in the late 1930s, living behind cloister walls, Edith Stein engaged in spiritual practices of reading, praying, and writing as she prepared to make her perpetual monastic vows. Writing her ”žVorbereitungsexerzitien für die ewigen hl. Gelübde (10. IV.–21. IV. 1938)“ (“Preparatory spiritual practices for perpetual monastic vows, April 10-21, 1938”) during Holy Week, Stein reflected on Jesus’ suffering, death, and resurrection through his mother’s perspective. In her poem “Juxta crucem tecum stare,” (“Under the cross to stand with you”), written on Good Friday 1938, Stein envisions herself at the foot of the cross as witness to the grief of Mary, the mother of Jesus. Drawing on the tradition of Mary as mater dolorosa or Mother of Sorrows, in the historical context of the ramping persecution of and violence against Jews in Germany in the late 1930s, Stein depicts Mary the mother of Jesus as the quintessential image of human suffering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSteiniana revista de estudios interdisciplinariosSame topicPhenomenology and Existential PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207