A lightweight four-channel multi-modal model to improve computational performance of automated fire detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The urgent need for advanced fire detection methods stems from the increased intensity of fire incidents, which cause massive property loss and irreversible damage. To overcome the limitations of traditional fire detection methods, such as those of smoke detectors, fire detection based on computer vision (CV) algorithms has been adopted to improve detection accuracy. Compared to single-modal fire detection, multi-modal fire detection has gained attention because it leverages the richer information present in both RGB and thermal images. However, prevalent multi-modal fire detection methods significantly increase model complexity by requiring two separate streams in the backbone to process RGB and thermal images independently. To address this issue, this paper proposes a four-channel single-stream fire detection method based on YOLOv5, which concatenates RGB and thermal images to form the required four-channel input. Comparison experiments with dual-stream YOLOv5 models using add fusion and transformer fusion demonstrate that the four-channel single-stream model reduces model complexity while improving detection accuracy. To further enhance detection accuracy and reduce model complexity, this study redesigned YOLOv5′s C3 module by integrating the convolutional block attention module (CBAM) to form the C3CBAM module and introduced the SCYLLA-IoU (SIoU) loss function. By comparing its performance with that of state-of-the-art (SOTA) models in multi-modal object detection, such as the YOLOv5-based dual-stream model, this study shows that the proposed approach improves detection in the diverse conditions presented in the selected dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".