MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414013672 · doi:10.1016/j.apjo.2025.100243

APAO survey of cataract surgeons’ attitudes toward operating room waste

2025· article· en· W4414013672 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
FundersAssociation of Physician Assistants in Oncology
KeywordsWaste managementOptometryEnvironmental sciencePsychologyMedicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To determine Asia Pacific cataract surgeons' attitudes toward surgical waste and toward reusing supplies and pharmaceuticals. DESIGN: Multinational survey of APAO members METHODS: An online survey link was distributed to APAO members through their national ophthalmology societies. Responses were deidentified and compared with those from identical survey questionnaires previously distributed to North American and European cataract surgeons. RESULTS: Of 2095 total respondents, most were concerned about climate change (94 %), felt cataract surgical waste was excessive (96 %), and felt we should reduce unnecessary waste by safely reusing more surgical supplies and devices (80 %). Most identified manufacturers and regulatory agencies as the biggest drivers of single use products, rather than surgeons and patients. Most surgeons wanted more reusable instruments and supplies (92 %) and wanted greater discretion from manufacturers (92 %) andpolicymakers (90 %) to reuse many supplies, drugs, and devices; 89 % wanted their medical societies to advocate for reducing the waste and carbon footprint of cataract surgery. Far more APAO respondents (59 %) were currently reusing single-use instruments compared to North Americans (7 %) and Europeans (14 %). Many APAO respondents were currently reusing phacoemulsification tubing/cassettes (41 %), irrigation solution bottles (50 %), and intraocular drug solutions (41-55 %); 42 % were currently not changing surgical gowns between cases. These percentages were all higher compared to North American and European respondents. CONCLUSIONS: These universal and consensus opinions and preferences about willingness to reuse many cataract surgical products should inform and influence pharmaceutical and supply manufacturers, governmental policy makers, and health care institutions, such as hospitals and surgical facilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it