Physiological Response Mechanisms of Triplophysa strauchii Under Salinity Stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
, a characteristic fish in Northwest China, physiologically responds to salinity stress. This study aimed to determine its salinity tolerance threshold and explore the associated physiological damage mechanisms. Six salinity gradients (11, 11.7, 12.5, 13.3, 14.3, 15.1 ppt) and a freshwater control group were established. Acute toxicity tests recorded mortality and behavior, while physiological-biochemical assays measured ion concentrations and enzyme activities in gills, kidneys, liver, intestines, and plasma over 96 h. The results showed a 96-hour median lethal concentration of 13.31 ppt and a safe concentration of 4.05 ppt. Gills and kidneys, as primary osmoregulatory organs, responded rapidly, whereas the liver and intestine lagged. Salinity ≤ 13.3 ppt allowed the fish to maintain homeostasis via physiological adjustments, but ≥14.3 ppt caused ion imbalance, immune function was significantly suppressed, and irreversible damage. These findings clarify the species' salinity adaptation strategies, providing a basis for further research on chronic salinity stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".