MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414015501 · doi:10.11159/mvml25.118

Adaptive Student’s T-Loss with Multi-Scale Uncertainty Modeling for Reliable Polyp Detection

2025· article· en· W4414015501 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alireza Norouziazad, Abed Matinpour, Farzin Deljoo, Behrouz Homam, Bhavya Trivedi, Razieh Salahandish

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacy and Medical Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScale (ratio)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate polyp segmentation in colonoscopy images is critical for early colorectal cancer detection, yet remains challenging due to reflections, occlusions, motion artifacts, and significant inter-and intra-polyp appearance variability.Compounding these difficulties, medical image segmentation often suffers from noisy or inconsistent ground-truth annotations, with inter-annotator Dice coefficients ranging from 0.72 to 0.88 in medical imaging tasks [1].These challenges contribute to the 17-28% polyp miss rate during conventional colonoscopy procedures [2,3].We introduce Student's T-Loss, a novel robust loss function specifically designed for polyp segmentation that addresses these challenges through five key innovations.First, Student's T-Loss incorporates a per-image learnable degrees-of-freedom parameter , predicted by a lightweight NuPredictor network to dynamically adjust robustness to outliers.Second, it employs per-pixel precision weights for spatially adaptive error sensitivity, allowing the model to modulate its response to uncertain regions.Third, it implements a multi-scale aggregation scheme that computes and combines loss at multiple spatial resolutions to capture both coarse structural context and fine-grained details.Fourth, we introduce uncertainty-guided active learning that leverages Student's T-Loss's inherent uncertainty estimates to identify the most ambiguous cases for expert re-annotation, reducing annotation burden by 37% while maintaining performance.Fifth, we implement dynamic threshold adaptation where the segmentation threshold varies spatially based on local uncertainty estimates, improving precision-recall balance by 12.3% in challenging boundary regions.Unlike conventional robust loss functions noise, Student's T-Loss specifically addresses the structured noise patterns inherent in colonoscopy data.Our approach integrates these components within a U-Net architecture with ResNet-34 encoder, where all elements, including segmentation parameters, -predictor, and -maps, are jointly optimized via backpropagation.We evaluated Student's T-Loss across five public polyp segmentation benchmarks: EndoScene, CVC-ClinicDB, ETIS-LaribPolypDB, Kvasir, and CVC-ColonDB.Our method achieved state-of-the-art performance across multiple metrics.Notably, Student's T-Loss obtained the lowest Hausdorff distance across all datasets, with an average reduction of 14.6% compared to standard T-Loss and a remarkable 45.96% reduction on EndoScene.It also achieved the lowest false discovery rate on all five datasets, improving over T-Loss by up to 38.7% on EndoScene and 24.5% on Kvasir.Additionally, Student's T-Loss demonstrated superior calibration, achieving expected calibration error as low as 0.44% on EndoScene and outperforming baselines on four of five datasets.A comprehensive ablation study confirmed the contribution of each component, with the full Student's T-Loss framework showing incremental improvements in both global and local uncertainty modeling.Statistical validation through 20 independent runs with paired t-tests confirmed the significance of performance gains (p<0.01 after Bonferroni correction).Despite these substantial improvements, Student's T-Loss maintains clinical deployability with real-time inference at 46.7 FPS (exceeding the 30 FPS clinical threshold) and minimal computational overhead, adding only 0.026M parameters and 0.102 GB VRAM during training.This balance of accuracy and efficiency makes it particularly suitable for real-world clinical settings.Our work establishes a new paradigm for robust polyp segmentation by jointly addressing annotation noise, domain variability, and boundary uncertainty.The consistent performance improvements across diverse datasets demonstrate Student's T-Loss's potential to reduce polyp miss rates and enhance the reliability of computer-aided detection systems in 118-2 colonoscopy.This approach not only advances polyp segmentation but also provides a blueprint for adaptive loss design in other noisy-label medical imaging domains where trustworthy segmentation is critical for clinical decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and ScienceSame topicPharmacy and Medical PracticesFrench-language works237,207