Enhanced Grid Stability and Demand-Side Optimization through Deep Neural Network-Controlled Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) Peak Shaving and Load Shifting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern power networks face both opportunities and problems from the quick adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) and the growing use of non-conventional resources.To keep the grid stable, controlling peak demands and making sure energy is distributed efficiently provide a significant challenge.By enabling bidirectional power transfer between EVs and the grid, vehicleto-grid (V2G) technology provides a workable option.As a result, EVs become mobile energy storage devices that may optimize energy consumption and lessen grid stress by recharging during off-peak hours (load shifting) and discharging electricity during peak demand (peak shaving).This study suggests a Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based Demand Side Management (DSM) approach for a grid-connected V2G energy storage system.By training the DNN to forecast short-term power use and user behaviour, EV charging and discharging cycles may be controlled in real time.Through advanced V2G operations, the model ensures optimal energy exchange by considering criteria including EV availability, battery State-of-Charge (SOC), grid load patterns, and power price.MATLAB/Simulink simulation results with various residential and business load profiles over a 24-hour period show how successful the suggested approach is.Peak grid power peaked at 166.5 kW without DNN management, however peak shaving based on DNN lowered this to 100 kW.The demand was further spread using load shifting, which produced a smoother load curve.The suggested DNN-based DSM strategy is a viable option for next-generation smart grids as it greatly improves grid stability, lowers operating costs, and makes it easier to integrate renewable energy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".