Proceedings of the 11th World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On behalf of the International Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (International ASET Inc.), the organizing committee would like to welcome you to the 11 th World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science (EECSS 2025).EECSS is aimed to become one of the leading international annual congresses in the fields of electrical engineering and computer systems and science.This congress will provide excellent opportunities to the scientists, researchers, industrial engineers, and university students to present their research achievements and to develop new collaborations and partnerships with experts in the field.We thank you fAt the eleventh edition of this conference, six Plenary Speakers and five Keynote Speakers will share their insights, aiming to expose participants to to a wide spectrum of applications, and to foster crosspollination of ideas and develop new research interests.In addition, around 100 papers will be presented by professors, students, and researchers from around the globe.or your participation and contribution to the 11 th World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science (EECSS 2025).We wish you a very successful and enjoyable experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it