MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414015701 · doi:10.11159/icbes25.174

Pose-based Hand Movement Tracking for Monitoring Psoriatic Arthritis Progression

2025· article· en· W4414015701 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Oliver Werthwein, Damian J. Bukieda, Lara Schweickart, Wilhelm Stork

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsoriatic arthritisComputer scienceTracking (education)Movement (music)Artificial intelligencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationArthritisComputer visionMedicineInternal medicinePsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by joint pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility, significantly impacting patients' quality of life.Accurate and continuous monitoring of hand mobility is crucial for assessing disease progression and therapy effectiveness.Traditional assessment methods often rely on subjective patient reports or sporadic clinical evaluations, leading to potential gaps in data and delayed therapeutic adjustments.This paper introduces a pose-based method for early detection and monitoring of psoriatic arthritis by analyzing hand closure movement videos recorded on smartphones.The proposed framework utilizes the Google MediaPipe Hand model to extract 3D hand joint coordinates from video sequences, which are then used to compute closing and stretching scores of the hand.These scores are derived using distance-based and angle-based metrics to quantify finger mobility, with a dedicated quality control mechanism ensuring that only videos meeting specific orientation and frame criteria are analyzed.Datasets comprising psoriasis patients and healthy individuals reveal that while the closing score offers robust and normalized measurements independent of anatomical variability, the stretching score requires lateral-view recordings for improved sensitivity.The results underscore the potential of this non-invasive, real-time tool to aid in early clinical intervention and long-term disease management.Future work will focus on integrating lateral-view analysis and joint thickness measurements for enhanced diagnostic accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and ScienceSame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207