MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414015730 · doi:10.11159/cist25.125

Optimization of the First-Mile Pickup Problem: A Real-Life Case Study

2025· article· en· W4414015730 on OpenAlex
Zehra Hafızoğlu Gökdağ, Ayşe Dilara Türkmen, Salih Cebeci

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMilePickupComputer scienceLast mile (transportation)Artificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents an optimization model for a logistics company to solve the first-mile pick-up problem.The first-mile pick-up stage is a vital element in the entire supply chain process, as inefficiencies in this phase can lead to significant delays and increased costs throughout the entire delivery network.The first-mile pick-up problem is the problem of collecting parcels from supplier companies to the target points with minimum cost.Determining optimal routes for parcel pickup vehicles is critical to minimize operational costs while meeting all constraints.Efficient routing ensures that resources such as fuel, driver hours, and vehicle capacity are effectively managed, preventing unnecessary delays and additional expenses.In the first-mile pick-up problem, there are constraints such as determining the order of visits to companies, satisfying time windows, having fixed source-target points for routes, not exceeding vehicle capacities, observing maximum distance limits, and visiting each customer point only once.Effectively addressing these constraints is essential to ensure that the model delivers practical and actionable solutions for real-world scenarios.While similar optimization models exist in the literature, none completely matches all aspects of our problem.This limitation highlights the need for a model that comprehensively addresses the unique challenges presented in first-mile logistics.Existing approaches like the Open Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows (OVRPTW) [1], Close-Open Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows (COVRPTW) [2], Multi-Depot Open Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows (MDOVRPTW) [3,4,5,6], and Multi-Depot Multiple Terminal Hamiltonian Path Problem (MDMTHPP) [7,8] each address different subsets of these constraints.Among these, MDOVRPTW emerges as the closest candidate to our problem requirements, however, this model does not include routing for fixed source-target points and maximum distance constraints.The first-mile pick-up problem is named as the multi-depot open vehicle routing problem with time windows and fixed target points (MDOVRPTW ft) and a mathematical model of the problem is created.The mathematical model of the problem was coded in IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio and applied to a real-life example.As a real-life example, the location of supplier companies and vehicles connected to a branch depot of a logistics company are considered.A distance matrix was created using the latitude-longitude information of the supplier companies in Open Route Service.This method ensures accurate distance calculations, which are crucial for generating optimal routes that align with real-world conditions.The observed total distance cost according to preferences of the vehicle drivers and the optimal total distance costs obtained from the model are calculated for three consecutive days.By comparing these results, the model's effectiveness in minimizing costs while ensuring practical feasibility is demonstrated.It is concluded that there is an average 49% improvement in the total distance cost for these three days.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it