Cigarette Smoke-Induced Cell Morphology via Keyence and Zeiss Microscopy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cigarette smoke exposure induces oxidative stress, disrupts gene regulation, and causes morphological alterations in lung epithelial cells.While conventional methods such as qPCR and Western blotting are often used to study these effects, they are costly, labor-intensive, and unsuitable for rapid screening.In this study, we introduce a cost-effective imaging strategy to characterize early cellular responses of human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEpCs) to cigarette smoke extract (CSE).For the first time, the Keyence VHX-7000 digital microscope was employed to systematically analyze CSE-induced morphological changes, with direct comparison to the established Zeiss Axiovert 200M inverted fluorescence microscope.Quantitative analysis revealed consistent trends across both systems, demonstrating that the Keyence platform effectively captures morphological alterations with high throughput and minimal sample preparation.These findings establish the Keyence VHX-7000 as a viable, scalable alternative for preliminary cellular injury assessments, offering a practical tool for accelerating research into smoking-related lung and cardiovascular diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it