The hidden price of food allergy: Understanding the social and financial burdens on families
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Food plays a unique role in culture and identity. For families managing food allergy, the role of food is complex and juxtaposed against the need to avoid known allergens, lest they risk an accidental exposure. While avoidance is simple in its instruction, the hidden prices of food allergy, namely the social and financial burdens on families, are substantial and fluid across the lifespan and in an era of rapid change in food allergy management and therapy. Families face significant impairments in quality of life, health-related quality of life, and food allergy anxiety, in addition to disproportionately higher food costs. The emergence of new food allergy therapies is exciting, but similarly carries high costs, which may not be in the financial reach of many families. Indeed, as a result of excess food costs compared to families not managing food allergy, families managing food allergy are at theoretically higher risk of being food insecure. Owing to these hidden prices, it behooves all involved in the care of patients with food allergy to ensure appropriate diagnoses (i.e., by an Allergist), alongside an allied health team committed to supporting the psychological and nutritional needs of the family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".