MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414022570 · doi:10.1080/26410397.2025.2555645

Digital justice and rights: bridging the fault lines in digital technology and SRHR

2023· editorial· en· W4414022570 on OpenAlexaff
Priya Nanda, Nina Sun, Emma Pitchforth, Eszter Kismödi

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual and Reproductive Health Matters · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEthics and Social Impacts of AI
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Gender and Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridging (networking)Economic JusticePolitical scienceComputer scienceComputer securityLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The unprecedented growth of digital innovations in the last decade has shaped recent discussions on health systems and health care delivery, including universal health care. Foreshadowing the immen...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.048
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.048
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.009
Scholarly communication0.0160.010
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0230.033
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexual and Reproductive Health MattersSame topicEthics and Social Impacts of AIFrench-language works237,207