MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414026437 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf6ab

Pavo: Stellar Feedback in Action in a Low-mass Dwarf Galaxy

2025· article· en· W4414026437 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael G. Jones, Martin P. Rey, David J. Sand, Kristine Spekkens, Burçı̇n Mutlu-Pakdı̇l, Elizabeth A. K. Adams, Paul Bennet, Denija Crnojević, Amandine Doliva-Dolinsky, Richard L. Donnerstein, Catherine E. Fielder, J. Healy, Laura E. Hunter, Ananthan Karunakaran, Deepthi S. Prabhu, Dennis Zaritsky

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione InternazionaleUniversity of TorontoBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNuclear Safety and Security CommissionSpace Telescope Science InstituteNational Research FoundationDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsDwarf galaxyAstrophysicsAction (physics)AstronomyGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract MeerKAT observations of the recently discovered, extremely low mass galaxy Pavo have revealed a neutral gas (H i) reservoir that was undetected in archival H i single dish data. We measure Pavo’s H i mass as log M HI / M ⊙ = 5.79 ± 0.05 , making it the lowest mass H i reservoir currently known in an isolated galaxy (with a robust distance measurement). Despite Pavo’s extreme isolation, with no known neighbor within over 700 kpc, its H i reservoir is highly disturbed. It does not show clear signs of rotation, and its center of mass is offset from the stellar body center by 320 pc, while its peak is offset by 82 pc (both in projection). Despite this disturbed morphology, Pavo still appears to be consistent with the H i size–mass relation, although it is not possible to accurately determine a suitable inclination correction. Such disturbed, offset, and disorganized H i reservoirs are predicted by simulations of low-mass, star-forming dwarfs in which supernova-driven outflows efficiently disrupt the interstellar medium after a star formation (SF) event. It is likely that we are witnessing Pavo in precisely this period, tens to a few hundred Myr after a SF episode, when internal feedback has disrupted its gas reservoir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→