MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414029961 · doi:10.5376/pgt.2025.16.0020

Genetic Diversity and Breeding Applications of Pitaya Germplasm: A Meta-Analysis Approach

2025· article· en· W4414029961 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhen Li, Zhijiang Li

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Gene and Trait · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermplasmGenetic diversityDiversity (politics)BiologyMeta-analysisBiotechnologyEvolutionary biologyAgronomyMedicineSociologyEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pitaya (scientific name Hylocereus ) is a tropical fruit that has become more popular in recent years and is now cultivated in many parts of the world. This study collects and organizes existing research data to analyze the genetic variation and breeding potential of pitaya. The pitaya varieties that are widely grown today show low genetic diversity, but germplasm resources from different regions still present some genetic differences. Molecular marker tools commonly used in research, such as SSR, ISSR, and RAPD, show that there is a moderate level of genetic diversity and some population structure in pitaya. These tools can help select good parent plants, use marker-assisted selection for target traits, and introduce wild species or germplasm from other areas. However, breeding work still faces problems such as limited sharing of germplasm resources and low application of molecular technology. In the future, building a global germplasm database and using multi-omics and smart breeding technologies may be helpful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Gene and TraitSame topicBotanical Research and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207