Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article interroge le discours sur la maladie dans le Journal de Marie Uguay, oeuvre fondée tout à la fois sur l’expérience du cancer et sur la tentative de le dépasser dans l’écriture. La maladie apparaît en des termes et par des procédés particuliers dans la mesure où la diariste omet le vocabulaire médical, technique, les comptes rendus de visites et de traitement. Cette omission, relativement surprenante par rapport aux conventions du genre diaristique, révèle une conception du langage qui fait l’économie de l’objectivité scientifique, du regard quantifiant et décisif sur les choses que peut poser la médecine. Dans un rapport instable à la maladie (tantôt tentant de l’expliquer, tantôt évitant toute explication) et au destinataire de cette écriture journalière, Marie Uguay avance dans le langage comme vers son destin, dans une expérience quotidiennement tragique, que seule sa parole ouverte sur la vie et sur le désir peut dire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".