MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414037561 · doi:10.1103/4d4b-kgtk

Estimates of the dynamic structure factor for the finite temperature electron liquid via analytic continuation of path integral Monte Carlo data

2025· article· en· W4414037561 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Chuna, Nicholas Barnfield, Jan Vorberger, Michael P. Friedlander, Tim Hoheisel, Tobias Dornheim

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilNorddeutscher Verbund für Hoch- und Höchstleistungsrechnen
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodContinuationAnalytic continuationStatistical physicsPath (computing)Path integral Monte CarloElectronPath integral formulationPhysicsMathematicsMathematical analysisQuantum Monte CarloComputer scienceNuclear physicsStatisticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the dynamic properties of uniform electron gas (UEG) is important for numerous applications ranging from semiconductor physics to exotic warm dense matter. In this work, we apply the maximum entropy method (MEM), as implemented by Thomas Chuna , , to path integral Monte Carlo (PIMC) results for the imaginary-time correlation function <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mi>F</a:mi> <a:mo>(</a:mo> <a:mi>q</a:mi> <a:mo>,</a:mo> <a:mi>τ</a:mi> <a:mo>)</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:math> to estimate the dynamic structure factor <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <b:mrow> <b:mi>S</b:mi> <b:mo>(</b:mo> <b:mi>q</b:mi> <b:mo>,</b:mo> <b:mi>ω</b:mi> <b:mo>)</b:mo> </b:mrow> </b:math> over an unprecedented range of densities at the electronic Fermi temperature. To conduct the MEM, we propose to construct the Bayesian prior <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mi>μ</c:mi> </c:math> from the PIMC data. Constructing the static approximation leads to a drastic improvement in <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <d:mrow> <d:mi>S</d:mi> <d:mo>(</d:mo> <d:mi>q</d:mi> <d:mo>,</d:mo> <d:mi>ω</d:mi> <d:mo>)</d:mo> </d:mrow> </d:math> estimate over using the simpler random phase approximation (RPA) as the Bayesian prior. We present results for the strongly coupled electron liquid regime with <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <e:mrow> <e:msub> <e:mi>r</e:mi> <e:mi>s</e:mi> </e:msub> <e:mo>=</e:mo> <e:mn>50</e:mn> <e:mo>,</e:mo> <e:mo>⋯</e:mo> <e:mo>,</e:mo> <e:mn>200</e:mn> </e:mrow> </e:math> , which reveal a pronounced roton-type feature and an incipient double peak structure in <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <f:mrow> <f:mi>S</f:mi> <f:mo>(</f:mo> <f:mi>q</f:mi> <f:mo>,</f:mo> <f:mi>ω</f:mi> <f:mo>)</f:mo> </f:mrow> </f:math> for intermediate wave numbers at <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <g:mrow> <g:msub> <g:mi>r</g:mi> <g:mi>s</g:mi> </g:msub> <g:mo>=</g:mo> <g:mn>200</g:mn> </g:mrow> </g:math> . We also find that our dynamic structure factors satisfy known sum rules, even though these sum rules are not enforced explicitly. To verify our results, we show that our MEM estimates converge to the RPA limit at higher densities and weaker coupling <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <h:mrow> <h:msub> <h:mi>r</h:mi> <h:mi>s</h:mi> </h:msub> <h:mo>=</h:mo> <h:mn>2</h:mn> </h:mrow> </h:math> and 5. Further, we compare with two different existing results at intermediate density and coupling strength <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <i:mrow> <i:msub> <i:mi>r</i:mi> <i:mi>s</i:mi> </i:msub> <i:mo>=</i:mo> <i:mn>10</i:mn> </i:mrow> </i:math> and 20, and we find good agreement with more conservative estimates. Combining all of our results for <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <j:mrow> <j:msub> <j:mi>r</j:mi> <j:mi>s</j:mi> </j:msub> <j:mo>=</j:mo> <j:mn>2</j:mn> <j:mo>,</j:mo> <j:mn>5</j:mn> <j:mo>,</j:mo> <j:mn>10</j:mn> <j:mo>,</j:mo> <j:mn>20</j:mn> <j:mo>,</j:mo> <j:mn>50</j:mn> <j:mo>,</j:mo> <j:mn>100</j:mn> <j:mo>,</j:mo> <j:mn>200</j:mn> </j:mrow> </j:math> , we present estimates of a dispersion relation that show a continuous deepening of its minimum value at higher coupling. An advantage of our setup is that it is not specific to the UEG, thereby opening up new avenues to study the dynamics of real warm dense matter systems based on cutting-edge PIMC simulations in future works.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207