MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414039100 · doi:10.1016/j.talo.2025.100548

Renewable carbon from flax shives with silver nanoparticles biosynthesized using Eichhornia crassipes extract for green electrochemical detection of hydroxychloroquine

2025· article· en· W4414039100 on OpenAlexaff
Francisco Contini Barreto, Gloria Tersis Vieira dos Santos, Maria Eduarda Barberis, Naelle Kita Mounienguet, Martin K. L. Silva, Quan He, Ivana Cesarino

Bibliographic record

VenueTalanta Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrochemical sensors and biosensors
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsHydroxychloroquineSilver nanoparticleRenewable energyEichhornia crassipesRotenoneCarbon NanoparticlesPulp and paper industryChemistryNanoparticleNanotechnologyMaterials scienceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)BiologyEngineeringMedicineAquatic plantEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an antimalarial drug that was repurposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, due to its limited clinical efficacy and notable side effects, its recommendation was later withdrawn. Despite this, HCQ sales increased by over 800% in Brazil, and its presence has since been detected in aquatic environments, raising concerns regarding potential risks to both environmental and human health. In response, a novel green electrochemical sensor was developed for the determination of HCQ in water samples. The sensor is based on a glassy carbon electrode modified with hydrochar derived from flax shives and silver nanoparticles biosynthesized using Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth) extract as a reducing and stabilizing agent (GC/HC-AgNPs). The sensor was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and cyclic voltammetry (CV). Experimental parameters were optimized, and the device was successfully applied for the detection of HCQ using differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). The sensor exhibited a linear response in the range of 1.0–40.0 µmol L⁻¹, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.265 µmol L⁻¹ and a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.885 µmol L⁻¹. Excellent repeatability (RSD = 2.27%) and reproducibility (RSD = 5.75%) were achieved. Application in tap and lake water samples resulted in recovery values ranging from 89.5% to 105.0%, and comparative analysis with UV–vis spectroscopy confirmed the accuracy of the proposed method. The sensor further demonstrated good selectivity even in the presence of relevant interfering species. Green chemistry assessment tools confirmed the sustainable character of the developed method. Overall, the proposed sensor represents a promising, effective, and environmentally friendly platform for HCQ monitoring in water matrices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.686

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTalanta OpenSame topicElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsFrench-language works237,207