MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414040237 · doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102165

Novel twin fang algorithm for advanced optimization of energy coordination in hybrid power systems

2025· article· en· W4414040237 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Science and Technology an International Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNorthern Border UniversityNorthern Borders UniversityUniversité Laval
KeywordsMicrogridRobustness (evolution)Hybrid powerHybrid systemOptimization algorithmElectric power systemOptimization problemHybrid algorithm (constraint satisfaction)Fitness function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, a hybrid microgrid approach to energy management is demonstrated using the newly introduced Twin Fang Optimization (TFO) algorithm, which imitates the key characteristics of natural predator–prey dynamics by integrating the Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) and Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA). This novel metaheuristic methodology was specifically developed to overcome the limitations of conventional algorithms, aiming for more efficient resource distribution among solar PV, wind, and battery storage systems. Within this work, the proposed TFO algorithm was applied to optimize hybrid microgrids in two geographically distinct sites in Bangladesh and Canada having two unique climatic and operational conditions to test the algorithm’s versatility. The results show that TFO significantly improves system performance across multiple evaluation metrics. It achieved Multi-Criteria Function values of 0.03825 in Bangladesh and 0.03725 in Canada, outperforming GWO, WOA, and PSO. Additionally, the energy levelized costs were reduced to $0.0354/kWh in Bangladesh and $0.0361/kWh in Canada. In both locations, the system maintained the full Sustainable Energy Score (SES), ensuring zero carbon emission and energy loss. Furthermore, the Power Supply Reliability Index (PSRI) was minimized to 1.25% in Bangladesh and 2.45% in Canada, indicating a high system reliability. The results demonstrate that TFO significantly outperforms both GWO and WOA in three out of four test cases, with p-values consistently below the 0.05 threshold, confirming the robustness and effectiveness of TFO. These findings suggest that TFO is a promising approach for optimizing energy systems in real-world hybrid microgrid applications. A comparative performance analysis underscores the robustness, faster convergence, and stability of the TFO algorithm against other well-established methods. Overall, this research presents TFO as a promising tool for smart energy systems, setting a new benchmark for efficient and resilient hybrid microgrid management under diverse regional conditions. • The Twin Fang Optimization (TFO) algorithm integrates Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) and Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) to address limitations of existing methods for hybrid microgrid energy management. • The TFO algorithm optimizes energy distribution among solar PV, wind, and batteries, tested in Ottawa (Canada) and Rangpur (Bangladesh) under varying environmental conditions. • TFO minimized the Multi-Criteria Function (MCF) to 0.03825 in Rangpur and achieved levelized costs of energy (LCOE) of $0.0350/kWh in Rangpur and $0.0356/kWh in Ottawa. • The algorithm ensured 100% renewable energy use, zero carbon emissions, and reduced loss of power supply probability to 1.20% in Rangpur and 2.40% in Ottawa. • TFO outperformed GWO, WOA, and PSO in energy management, demonstrating its robustness and efficiency as a benchmark for hybrid microgrids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it