MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414040881 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3606793

Rate Adaptation and Power Control for IoT Networks With Ambient Energy Harvesting: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach

2025· article· en· W4414040881 on OpenAlexaff
Abdulaziz Alorainy, Nour Kouzayha, Hesham ElSawy, Mohamed‐Slim Alouini, Tareq Y. Al-Naffouri

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology
KeywordsReinforcement learningQueueing theoryNetwork packetPower controlTransmitter power outputWireless sensor networkWireless networkTransmission (telecommunications)Wireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Internet of Things (IoT) networks, ensuring the timely delivery of information is significantly constrained by the limited energy resources of IoT devices and the signal attenuation experienced in wireless channels. In this paper, we investigate resource management for self-sustaining IoT networks with ambient radio frequency (RF) energy harvesting via a spatio-temporal approach. We consider a hard deadline for packet delivery, and we aim to jointly reduce the age of information (AoI) and the packet drop rate due to the hard deadline for packet delivery or buffer overflow. To achieve that, using tools from deep reinforcement learning (DRL) and stochastic geometry, we propose a joint rate adaptation and power control scheme that accounts for the spatial topology of the network and the temporal attributes at the device level. In particular, stochastic geometry is leveraged to characterize the energy harvesting process and the packet transmission success probability for a given transmit rate and power. Furthermore, the joint rate adaptation and power control policy at the device level is obtained using a deep R-network (DRN), which is a DRL algorithm that utilizes a deep neural network to approximate the R-function (the expected average reward). The performances of the last-come-first-served (LCFS) queuing discipline, the first-come-first-served (FCFS) queuing discipline, and a proposed hybrid queuing discipline are compared. For the proposed hybrid queuing discipline, DRL is used not only for rate adaptation and power control but also for specifying the transmission order of generated packets. The presented numerical results demonstrate that the LCFS queuing discipline improves AoI performance, while the FCFS queuing discipline improves packet drop rate. Also, the proposed hybrid queuing discipline strikes an intricate balance between AoI and packet drop rate, and achieves a good performance in both measures compared to the other queuing disciplines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207