MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414044057 · doi:10.5206/mase/19418

Impact of vaccination and nonlinear incidence rate on the dynamic of influenza strains epidemic model: Optimal control approach

2025· article· en· W4414044057 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mourad Ouyadri, Amine El Koufi, Salaheddine Belhdid

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics in Applied Sciences and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasic reproduction numberOptimal controlStability (learning theory)Epidemic modelVaccinationTransmission (telecommunications)MATLABNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we develop and analyze a mathematical model describing the transmission dynamics of influenza strains, including both drug-resistant and non-resistant variants. Our model generalizes several existing epidemic models by incorporating key biological factors. We first prove the existence, uniqueness, positivity, and boundedness of global solutions to ensure the model is well-posed under natural conditions. Using the next-generation matrix method, we calculate two basic reproduction numbers associated with the model. We identify four biologically relevant equilibrium points: the disease-free equilibrium, the resistant endemic equilibrium, the non-resistant endemic equilibrium, and the coexistence endemic equilibrium. The local stability of these equilibrium is established through standard stability analysis techniques. Furthermore, we propose two optimal control strategies, treatment and media awareness campaigns based on Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle to reduce the spread of infection. Numerical simulations performed in Matlab illustrate and support our theoretical results. Finally, the paper concludes with a discussion and suggestions for future research directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics in Applied Sciences and EngineeringSame topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFrench-language works237,207