Brain structure-function coupling – relationship with language lateralisation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Language is one of the most extensively studied lateralised cognitive functions in the human brain, predominantly relying on the left hemisphere in most individuals. However, the mechanisms by which a stable white matter architecture underpins individual language functions remain unclear. Previous studies have employed structural connectivity (SC) and functional connectivity (FC) coupling for individual fingerprinting and task decoding, suggesting that variability in brain entropy may serve as a distinguishing characteristic for language lateralisation. We examined a large cohort of healthy adults (n = 285) to investigate SC-FC coupling and identify markers distinguishing different language laterality groups. Functional connectivity was measured using resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) time-series data, while structural connectivity was determined via probabilistic fibre tractography. SC-FC coupling was investigated using the SENSAAS language atlas and defined as the Pearson correlation between non-zero elements of regional structural and functional connectivity profiles. Group differences were assessed using the PALM toolbox in FSL. Our findings revealed that increased SC-FC coupling in the left precentral sulcus was associated with typical language lateralisation, while increased coupling in the right middle temporal gyrus and left anterior insula was observed in individuals with atypical language lateralisation (pFDR < 0.05). Non-lateralised individuals exhibited increased coupling in the left anterior insula compared to lateralised (pFDR<0.05). SC-FC coupling offers a promising framework to uncover functional and anatomical differences among individuals with varying language lateralisation. This regional specificity indicates that typical, atypical, and non-lateralised profiles rely on different structural-functional alignments, likely reflecting the recruitment of alternative pathways for language processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".