Large-scale Proteomics Profiling of Peripheral Blood of DM1 patients identifies biomarkers for disease severity and functional capacity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 (DM1), the most common genetic neuromuscular disorder in adults, poses significant challenges for drug development due to its multisystem nature and high clinical variability in symptoms and disease progression. With a growing number of therapies entering clinical trials, this study addresses the urgent need for biomarkers that can serve as surrogate endpoints. Methods: We profiled 437 serum samples from adult DM1 patients collected at two timepoints of the OPTIMISTIC trial using bottom-up mass spectrometry with data-independent acquisition. Associations between protein expression, the disease-causing CTG-repeat and 25 clinical outcome measures were studied using linear mixed-effect models. All key study findings were validated in an independent cohort of 69 DM1 patients and 10 healthy controls. Results: Of the 259 identified proteins, 161 showed significant associations with the CTG-repeat length (FDR < 5%). Hypogammaglobulinemia was confirmed and shown to be worse in severely affected patients. A strong proteomic signature was associated with clinical measures of functional capacity, with the 6-Minute Walk Test showing the strongest signal (70 associations, FDR < 5%). These novel associations reveal a compelling link between chronic inflammation and reduced functional capacity. A machine learning algorithm identified a minimal set of 13 proteins robustly reflecting both the underlying genetic defect and functional capacity. Conclusions: DM1 induces a broad disease fingerprint in the serum proteome, predominantly affecting proteins of the immune system. A carefully selected panel of proteins showed the greatest potential to meet the statistical criteria required for surrogate endpoints in clinical trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".