MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414052411 · doi:10.24124/2025/30549

Clinical social work with children and youth at Connexus Community Resources

2025· dissertation· en· W4414052411 on OpenAlexaff
Danielle Rasmussen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Policies
Canadian institutionsThompson Rivers UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPracticumSocial workAgency (philosophy)Clinical social workMental healthSocial skillsSense of agencyPerspective (graphical)Social Welfare

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report outlines my practicum experience as a Child and Youth Mental Health (CYMH) counselor at Connexus Community Resources from July 2024 to February 2025. I completed my practicum on the clinical services team at Connexus which allowed me to get a sense of the different programs and services provided by the agency while focusing on clinical counseling. The report outlines my learning goals, which include developing skills in different therapeutic modalities (specifically Cognitive Behavioural Therapy [CBT] and play therapy) and using these skills to address complex trauma, as well as to learn how to utilize different counselling skills cross culturally; these goals are all pointed towards my overall goal, which was to start developing my identity as a clinical social worker in the north. My personal positioning and theoretical orientation, specifically how my social location shapes my current practice and how I follow a social constructivist strengths-based approach, are explored. A literature review highlights five topics that formed the foundation of my learning goals and shaped my practicum: complex trauma, the therapeutic relationship and play therapy, CBT and Trauma-Focused CBT, northern practice, and cross-cultural work with Indigenous children and youth. A discussion of my learning experience highlights the progress I made in completing my learning goals as well as demonstrates some of the challenges I encountered, such as in learning how to shift my lens from a child welfare perspective to a clinical perspective.,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0260.013
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.015
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSocial Sciences and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207