MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414054166 · doi:10.1109/twc.2025.3604003

Active STAR-RIS-Aided Wireless Powered Communication Networks

2025· article· en· W4414054166 on OpenAlexaff
Ji Wang, Yixuan Li, Xingwang Li, Derrick Wing Kwan Ng, Octavia A. Dobre

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBeamformingMaximizationWirelessEnergy harvestingTransmission (telecommunications)Energy (signal processing)Optimization problemWireless sensor networkFractional programmingTransmitter power output

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate a wireless powered communication network (WPCN) in which a multi-antenna hybrid access point (HAP) communicates with multiple Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices, assisted by an active simultaneously transmitting and reflecting reconfigurable intelligent surface (aSTAR-RIS). In the energy transfer (ET) phase, the IoT devices harvest energy from the HAP with a nonlinear energy harvesting (EH) model, and subsequently transmit information signals to the HAP during the information transmission (IT) phase. To explore its full potential, the aSTAR-RIS employs energy splitting (ES), mode switching (MS), and time switching (TS) protocols. A sum rate maximization problem is formulated for each protocol, which jointly optimize the beamforming at the HAP, allocation of time slots and transmitting power for the IoT devices, and the adaptation of the aSTAR-RIS coefficients. To address the optimization problem with multiple coupled variables and complex non-convex constraints, we firstly decompose it into several subproblems. Specifically, to optimize the coefficients of the aSTAR-RIS in the IT phase, we develop a fractional programming-based successive convex approximation algorithm to handle the fractional objective function and the minimum rate constraints. Moreover, to obtain the coefficients of the aSTAR-RIS during the ET phase, we design a penalty-based SCA algorithm to address the binary constraints in the MS protocol and the rank-one constraints. Numerical results demonstrate that 1) employing the aSTAR-RIS in WPCNs can realize the extraordinary sum rate gain in comparison with the benchmarks of the active RIS and the passive STAR-RIS; 2) among the three operation protocols, the ES demonstrates the best performance, with the MS following closely behind, while the TS is the least effective; 3) as the minimum required data rate for each IoT device decreases, the performance gap among the three protocols becomes narrower.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207