MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414057587 · doi:10.58931/cht.2025.4s0570

Expert Discussion: Building Unique Networks and Partnerships to Bring Novel Therapies to Remote Patients

2025· article· en· W4414057587 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Arleigh McCurdy, Nicole Laferriere

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Hematology Today · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsThunder Bay Regional Health Sciences CentreOttawa Hospital
FundersMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsMEDLINERaising (metalworking)Patient carePatient privacyBest practiceKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Novel, highly effective therapies for multiple myeloma are raising hopes, while also adding complexity to treatment decisions and care management. Recently, Canadian Hematology Today sat down with two Canadian experts and discussed what the availability of novel therapies means for patients, and how clinical leaders are coordinating care to improve access for patients in Northern Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.077
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.077
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0220.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Hematology TodaySame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207