MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414061944 · doi:10.3354/meps14961

Groups of foraging North Atlantic right whales occur under diverse prey field conditions in the southwestern Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada

2025· article· en· W4414061944 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gina L. Lonati, Delphine Durette‐Morin, Halyna Klymentieva, Larissa Roehl, Scott A. Pavey, Mark F. Baumgartner, Kimberley T. A. Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Ecology Progress Series · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForagingPredationWhaleRight whaleHabitatEndangered species

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The southwestern Gulf of St. Lawrence (swGSL), Canada, is a foraging habitat for endangered North Atlantic right whales Eubalaena glacialis (NARWs). Late-stage copepods of the genus Calanus are NARW prey, and 3 Calanus species are present in the swGSL. We aimed to characterize spatiotemporal patterns in Calanus and environmental conditions associated with groups of foraging NARWs in 2 valleys of the swGSL, and to evaluate correlations between conditions and whale sighting rates. Over 3 years, we conducted day/night oceanographic profiling and whale surveys at 17 stations during July and August. C. finmarchicus and C. hyperboreus dominated the prey field in proportions that varied among stations, with less contribution from C. glacialis . Calanus layers typically occurred between 18 and 40 m subsurface and/or within 12 m of the seafloor. Three general vertical distributional patterns of Calanus were observed: a single subsurface layer, a single deep layer, or both subsurface and deep layers. Patterns corresponded with prey species composition and activity state (i.e. active or diapausing) within a station. Environmental conditions did not explain variation in whale sighting rates among stations. These results imply that NARWs regularly adjust their dive depth to exploit Calanus layers throughout the water column in the swGSL, except very close to the surface where prey concentrations are generally low. No single environmental context observed in our study can fully explain the diet, behavior, or distribution of NARWs in the swGSL, where multiple prey species likely increase the breadth of possible foraging conditions relative to more southerly, warmer habitats where C. finmarchicus alone dominates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Ecology Progress SeriesSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207