MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414069159 · doi:10.31083/rcm38912

Updated Trends in Valvular Heart Disease-Related Heart Failure in G20-the Group of Twenty Countries: Insights From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

2025· article· en· W4414069159 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cheng Liu, Shenghui Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Cardiovascular Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsHeart failureDiseasePreparednessDisease burdenBurden of diseasePublic healthHealth careGlobal health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Valvular heart disease (VHD), including both non-rheumatic valvular heart disease (NRVHD) and rheumatic valvular heart disease (RVHD), is a major global health concern. Moreover, the progression of VHD to heart failure (HF) poses substantial clinical and public health challenges. In light of the global population aging, alongside increasing cardiovascular risk factors, and the additional strain imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, a timely reassessment of the VHD-related HF burden is urgently needed. Using the most recent data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2021, this study aimed to evaluate the distribution of VHD-related HF burden in 2021, examining the long-term trends from 1990 to 2021, and short-term changes between 2019 and 2021, to provide updated insights to inform future prevention and management strategies. Methods: Using GBD 2021 data, we analyzed the distribution of VHD-related HF burden in age-standardized prevalence rates across the Group of Twenty (G20) countries. Results: The highest NRVHD-related HF burden in 2021 was observed in the United States (US), Italy, and Russia, while the highest RVHD-related HF burden was noted in India, France, and China. Over the past 30 years (1990-2021), the NRVHD-related HF burden decreased in developed countries (e.g., the US, Canada, Japan) but increased in emerging economies (e.g., India, Brazil, South Africa), with significant increases also observed in Argentina, Mexico, Brazil, among other countries. Notably, nearly all G20 countries exhibited a downward trend in RVHD-related HF burden, with Germany and Australia being the exceptions. During the COVID-19 pandemic (2019-2021), the NRVHD-related HF burden declined in most G20 nations, except for South Africa, India, and a few others, while the RVHD-related HF burden increased slightly in countries such as Mexico, Russia, and Indonesia. Conclusions: Trends in NRVHD- and RVHD-related HF burden across G20 countries exhibited notable variations, and these became more pronounced under the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings underscore the importance of developing long-term strategies to enhance the resilience of healthcare systems, improve chronic disease management, and optimize resource allocation to promote cardiovascular health and preparedness for public health challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReviews in Cardiovascular MedicineSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207