Phoneme-Aware Augmentation for Robust Cantonese ASR Under Low-Resource Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cantonese automatic speech recognition (ASR) faces persistent challenges due to its nine lexical tones, extensive phonological variation, and the scarcity of professionally transcribed corpora. To address these issues, we propose a lightweight and data-efficient framework that leverages weak phonetic supervision (WPS) in conjunction with two pho-neme-aware augmentation strategies. (1) Dynamic Boundary-Aligned Phoneme Dropout progressively removes entire IPA segments according to a curriculum schedule, simulating real-world phenomena such as elision, lenition, and tonal drift while ensuring training stability. (2) Phoneme-Aware SpecAugment confines all time- and frequency-masking operations within phoneme boundaries and prioritizes high-attention regions, thereby preserving intra-phonemic contours and formant integrity. Built on the Whistle encoder—which integrates a Conformer backbone, Connectionist Temporal Classification–Conditional Random Field (CTC-CRF) alignment, and a multi-lingual phonetic space—the approach requires only a grapheme-to-phoneme lexicon and Montreal Forced Aligner outputs, without any additional manual labeling. Experiments on the Cantonese subset of Common Voice demonstrate consistent gains: Dynamic Dropout alone reduces phoneme error rate (PER) from 17.8% to 16.7% with 50 h of speech and 16.4% to 15.1% with 100 h, while the combination of the two augmentations further lowers PER to 15.9%/14.4%. These results confirm that structure-aware phoneme-level perturbations provide an effective and low-cost solution for building robust Cantonese ASR systems under low-resource conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".