Effect of psilocybin therapy on suicidal ideation, attempts, and deaths in people with psychiatric diagnoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Suicidal ideation, attempts, and deaths present a major and tragic public health concern. Recent trials of psilocybin therapy (PT) have shown promise in treating treatment-resistant depression and have found a reduction in suicidal ideation. Given the growth of PT research, there is a need to further understand its effect on suicidal ideation, attempts, and deaths. Objective: To assess and synthesize evidence on the effects of PT on suicidal ideation, attempts, and deaths in psychiatric patients. Design: PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Data source: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and PsychINFO. Method: Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of PT in adults with psychiatric diagnoses that reported suicide outcomes (ideation, attempts, and deaths). Abstract and full-text screening were conducted, and suicide outcomes were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model to assess changes in suicide outcomes compared to control through the standardized mean difference (SMD). Assessment of heterogeneity, risk of bias, and subgroup analysis was completed. Results: Nine studies were included ( N = 593; 335 psilocybin & 258 control). Two studies were excluded from meta-analysis because suicide-related outcomes data were not available. Participants with PT experienced a small and significant decrease in suicidal ideation compared to control ( k = 7, SMD = −0.24, 95% CI −0.42 to −0.06, p = 0.008, I 2 = 0%). There was no publication bias found. Subgroup analysis found no significant differences between groups. No study reported suicide attempts or suicide deaths. Two studies had a high risk of bias. Conclusion: Psilocybin therapy may reduce suicidal ideation in adults with psychiatric diagnoses. Current studies are limited by small sample size, lack of follow-up data, and assessment of blinding. Trial registration: CRD42023445706.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it