MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414073382 · doi:10.1111/1758-2229.70193

Influence of Plant Species and De‐Icing Salt on Microbial Communities in Bioretention

2025· article· en· W4414073382 on OpenAlexafffund
Henry Béral, Jacques Brisson, Margit Kõiv‐Vainik, Joan Laur, Danielle Dagenais

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Microbiology Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Stormwater Management Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEesti Teadusagentuur
KeywordsMesocosmBioretentionMicrobial population biologyBacteriaEcosystemMicroorganismSalinityPlant community

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Bioretention (BR) systems are green infrastructures used to manage runoff even in cold climates. Bacteria and fungi play a role in BR's performance. This mesocosm study investigated the influence of plant species and de‐icing salt on the diversity, the community composition, and the differential abundance of bacteria and fungi in BR. Cornus sericea, Juncus effusus , Iris versicolor and Sesleria autumnalis were selected. They are planted in BR while differing in terms of biological forms and functional traits. The semi‐synthetic stormwater used was supplemented in spring with four NaCl concentrations (0, 250, 1000 or 4000 mg Cl.L −1 ). Soil was sampled before the experiment, before salt application, and 5 months after the end of the salt treatment. The bacterial and fungal taxa were characterised by sequencing the 16S and ITS regions. The bacteria and fungi found in the BR were adapted to a cold, humid, and contaminated environment. No differences in microbial communities and their functions between treatments were perceivable 5 months after salt treatment. The taxa abundantly present are involved in functions related to the nitrogen cycle, degradation of hydrocarbons, metals tolerance, and remediation. Some were putative plant beneficial symbionts. The presence of certain microbial taxa varied significantly between plant species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Microbiology ReportsSame topicUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsFrench-language works237,207