MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414078927 · doi:10.1016/j.cont.2025.102028

104 - How does Running Affect the Posterior Urethrovesical Angle in Females With and Without Running-Induced Urinary Incontinence?

2025· article· en· W4414078927 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marina Petter Rodrigues, Marie‐Ève Bérubé, Sabine Vesting, Linda McLean

Bibliographic record

VenueContinence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAffect (linguistics)Urinary systemTable (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypothesis / aims of study Pelvic floor strain during running has been observed in females both with and without running-induced urinary incontinence (RI-UI) (1). Since the posterior urethrovesical angle (PUVA) is linked to the functional integrity of proximal urethral support and larger PUVAs have been observed in females with SUI, we assessed whether PUVA before running, or PUVA changes after a bout of treadmill running differ between runners with and without RI-UI. Compared to continent runners, we hypothesized that incontinent runners would demonstrate larger PUVAs before and larger increases after a single bout of treadmill running. Study design, materials and methods This research ethics board-approved case-control study recruited female runners, ≥18 years old, with and without RI-UI, who had been running ≥10 km/week at ≥ 6 km/h for at least one year. Continent runners had never experienced urine leakage while running. Incontinent runners self-reported ≥ 1 episode of RI-UI/week or in at least half of their running sessions. Runners in both groups had to report rarely experiencing UI outside of exercise (≤once a month). Urgency-related leakage was also an exclusion criterion in both groups, but occasional urgency without leakage was not. Additional exclusion criteria were major urogenital surgery, pelvic organ prolapse > POP-Q stage 2, pregnancy or ≤1year postpartum, self-reported symptoms of energy deficiency or any injury or health condition that impacted treadmill running. The data collection session was scheduled within the first 15 days of the menstrual cycle if participants menstruated or at any convenient time if they did not. Data collection included transabdominal 3D ultrasound imaging (GE Voluson S6 system, RAB6-9 curvilinear probe; GE Healthcare, Toronto, Canada) to measure bladder volume (BV) in supine and transperineal measurement of the PUVA in standing. Images were acquired before and after a 38-minute treadmill run which consisted of a 6-minute warm-up, a 30-minute self-paced run (12-14 on the Borg rating of perceived exertion scale), and a 2-minute cool-down. 4D View (GE Healthcare) and ImageJ (National institutes of Health, USA) software were used to measure BV and PUVA, respectively, the latter defined as the angle between the posterior urethral wall and the bladder base (Figure 1), measured with the researcher blinded to participant’s symptoms. A repeated-measures general linear model was used to determine the impact of time (pre/post-run) and group (continent vs. incontinent) on PUVA, including BV and PUVA before the run as covariates. Results 90 runners participated, PUVA visualization was poor in 13 participants thus they were excluded from the analysis. The incontinent runners (n=23) were older and had higher parity than the continent runners (n=54) (Table 1). Before the run, PUVA was not different between the groups (Table 1). PUVA increased after running in all participants (F (1,1)=0.16, p=0.03), with no significant effect of group (F(1,1=0.36, p=0.54), BV (F(1,1)=1.51, p = 0.22) nor interaction between group x time (F(1,1)=0.16, p=0.68). Interpretation of results Proximal urethral support is reduced in females after a treadmill run, as PUVA increased after running across the entire sample. Because there were no group differences and the effect sizes were small, it is unlikely that the PUVA alone contributes to RI-UI. This is in contrast to findings of larger PUVAs among those with SUI during activities of daily living (2) and may suggest that the pathogenesis of RI-UI is different from that of general SUI. Concluding message As PUVA increased during running in both groups, running may influence proximal urethral support; however, this factor alone does not appear to be related to urine leakage during running. A combination of intrinsic factors and/or external factors such as running mechanics may contribute to urine leakage among runners. Download: Download high-res image (135KB) Download: Download full-size image Figure 1 . Table 1. Demographic and PUVA data Download: Download high-res image (45KB) Download: Download full-size image Figure 2 . Figure 1. PUVA measured before (left panel) and after (right panel) the run from one participant. Funding Canadian Institutes of Health Research Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee University of Ottawa Research Ethics Board Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContinence→Same topicPelvic floor disorders treatments→French-language works237,207→