MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414079705 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3606847

MaestroBot: Generalized Gesture-Driven Hierarchical Coordination for Robotic Formations

2025· article· en· W4414079705 on OpenAlexaff
Yutong Liu, Zhiye Wang, Yuan Xu, Haiming Jin, Linghe Kong, Rui Li, Xi Chen, Qiao Xiang, Junwen Zhang, Guihai Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsImpact
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsScalabilityAdaptabilityWearable computerWirelessTestbedSwarm behaviourRobotDomain (mathematical analysis)Gesture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Robotic swarm coordination holds transformative potential for applications such as warehouse automation, search & rescue, and entertainment. However, approaches relying on wearable devices or vision-based systems are often constrained by hardware-intensive, high computational requirements, reliance on line-of-sight, and privacy concerns. Wireless sensing, particularly using Channel State Information (CSI), offers a promising alternative by translating environmental perturbations into CSI variation data. Nevertheless, existing CSI-based systems face significant challenges in domain adaptation, resource limitation, and scalability issues. This paper introduces MaestroBot, a hierarchical motion coordination system that combines distributed CSI-based wireless sensing with domain-adaptive learning to address these limitations. For leader robots, the system features a lightweight hand gesture recognition model, built on a “Hybrid-Single” knowledge distillation framework, achieving up to 95.87% accuracy while maintaining adaptability across diverse domains. For follower robots, the hierarchical motion propagation model leverages localized CSI analysis and dual-layer error correction mechanisms to deliver 97.2% accuracy with a low latency of 0.085 seconds, even in multi-row formations. Additionally, its cost-effective hardware design ensures practical scalability and real-world deployability. These results position MaestroBot as an efficient, robust, and privacy-preserving solution for large-scale robotic swarm coordination in dynamic environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Mobile ComputingSame topicRobot Manipulation and LearningFrench-language works237,207