MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414079798 · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2025.3598611

Integrated Fault Estimation and Fault-Tolerant Tracking Control for Unmanned Surface Vessels Under Connectivity-Hybrid Cyber-Attacks

2025· article· en· W4414079798 on OpenAlexaff
Chun Liu, Liang Xu, Dezhi Xu, Xiaofan Wang, Youmin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersShanghai Municipal Education CommissionNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Shanghai
KeywordsRudderTracking (education)Control theory (sociology)Convergence (economics)ActuatorFault (geology)Iterative learning controlTracking error

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to tackle the tracking control problem of multiple unmanned surface vessels (USVs). It considers the impact of connectivity-hybrid cyber-attacks in the networked level, and wave-induced disturbances, as well as severe and nonsevere unified modeling rudder angle faults in the physical level. To do this, the study establishes USV models, taking into account actuator fault and cyber-attack modeling. It then presents the augmented estimator-based decentralized fault estimation (FE) and leader-following consensus-based distributed fault-tolerant tracking control (FTTC) protocols. These are incorporated into an integrated structure that ensures the robust asymptotic convergence of estimation errors and excellent tracking performance of multi-USVs. Finally, the study derives criteria for an exponential tracking of composite faulty multi-USVs under cyber-attacks using dual-constraint restriction (attack frequency and excitation rate). Comparative simulations substantiate the advantage of the developed integrated FE and FTTC scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CyberneticsSame topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207