MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414080826 · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013459

Blood flow in the human cerebral cortex: Large-scale pial vascularization and 1D simulation

2025· article· en· W4414080826 on OpenAlexaff
Eduardo Guerreiro Zilves, Lucas O. Müller, Gonzalo D. Maso Talou, Vladimir Hachinski, J. David Spence, Pablo J. Blanco

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Computational Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoHealth Research Council of New ZealandCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsPulsatile flowBlood flowCerebral blood flowHemodynamicsBlood pressureCerebral autoregulationIntracranial pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding cerebral circulation is crucial for early diagnosis and patient-oriented therapies for brain conditions. However, blood flow simulations at the organ scale have been limited. This work introduces a framework for modeling extensive vascular networks in the human cerebral cortex and conducting pulsatile blood flow simulations. Using a patient-specific cerebral geometry, we applied a parallelized adaptive constrained constructive optimization algorithm to create a comprehensive pial vascular network in the left hemisphere, starting from the main cerebral arteries. The resulting network included over 75 000, 103 000, and 55 000 vessels for the anterior, middle, and posterior territories, respectively. Pial vessel diameters featured a median [interquartile range, IQR] value of [Formula: see text]. We integrated the pial vascular network model with the Anatomically-Detailed Arterial Network (ADAN) model to conduct one-dimensional (1D) blood flow simulations under normotensive and hypertensive conditions. Viscoelastic dissipation proved to be a key ingredient in the characterization of the hemodynamic environments in the pial circulation. In the normotensive scenario, mean blood pressure in the pial vessels resulted in a median [IQR] value of [Formula: see text]. The flow pulsatility index and its corresponding damping factor were effective descriptors of the hypertensive state. The median [IQR] pulsatility index in the normotensive state was [Formula: see text], and in hypertension it increased up to [Formula: see text], while its corresponding damping factor in the normotensive state was [Formula: see text], and in the hypertensive state it was reduced to [Formula: see text]. We observed large regional pressure gradients in terminal vessels, with pressure levels ranging from [Formula: see text] in normotension to [Formula: see text] in hypertension. Additionally, the pulsatility index at terminal vessels increased with distance from the Circle of Willis in the hypertensive case, contrasting with the decreasing pattern seen in normotension. This approach provides a unique characterization of hemodynamics in the pial vascular network of the human cerebral cortex, paving the way for research into microcirculatory environments, the link between hemodynamics and neural function, and their roles in conditions like stroke and dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS Computational BiologySame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207